"Will it come to
'that'?"
This is the front-page headline of 'The Nation', whose Political Desk grabbed my attention by taking '...a look at the possibilities and at how well-eqipped Thaksin Shinawatra is militarily to survive politically', showcasing 3 photos of high-profile generals who could contend for power in the event of a coup. In one potential case, Shinawatra would topple his own government, and rewrite the constitution on his own terms, in order to 'correct' the current constitutional guidelines that have produced such flawed democratic processes.
It's funny that the newspaper can discuss these scenarios so openly in a country where freedom of expression can be so severely restricted when it comes to sensitive matters such as the king (Rama IX), whose image or seal is displayed on almost every wall and billboard in the country. Shinawatra, a colorful character that opponents and critics have accused of political treachery, appears more and more flagrant in his disrespect or disregard for the current political institutions. He is currently accused of financing fictitious political parties to oppose him in the recent elections that were boycotted by the opposition, elections that he would have won because of his party's immense popularity among the rural poor that enjoy the windfall of its populist (if corruptly so) practices.
The charismatic Shinawatra seems to be fed up with compulsory deference to a crown that has been a politically and socially infallible icon in Thailand since the authoritarian government established by a 1958 military coup decided that the official installation of traditional cultural paternalist practices, including deified royal reverence, would combat the growing threat from the left and to justify and legitimize the violent coup.
Since April, Thaksin has been in charge of a 'caretaker government', having dissolving parliament to prove the democratic mandate of the power that he and his personally financed Thai Rak Thai (Thais Love Thais) have held since 2001.
Being the richest man in Thailand, Thaksin, a graduate of Sam Houston State, rose to power through the wealth(prestige) acquired through his monopolization of the national telecommunications industry. The pen may be mightier than the sword, but this maxim may be rendered inconsequential here in the context of the crony/clan-market capitalist political economy Thailand where there is a realistic possibility of buying both the biggest pen and the sharpest sword. I am intrigued by the developing political turmoil and may return to it frequently.
$$$Change of Topic$$$
A friend of mine introduced me to a local barber whose 15-year-old son happens to be the youngest member of the Thai national olympic boxing team, currently training year-round in a secured facility in the locality of Nakhon Ratchasima (Khorat) at Khao Yai. After giving me a haircut, the proud father posed with me and his son's trophies and medals (Amassed during a career that began at age 7 (56-3 lifetime record, undefeated professionaly, currently the top-ranked high school boxer in the nation)).
The father said he had fought professionally, gladly handing over the 'mother-stick weapon' to his son when the time came. When I inquired what kind of stick this was, my friend informed me that it was symbolic term, referring to the methodical use of the shins, knees, elbows, fists, and mind.
More on this later (The son is due to return home for a short visit in mid-July because he is frequently on tour or in seclusion at the camp at the restricted camp (he is afforded no contact with females while in training), but the father informed me that for the occasion of his arrival, his shop will become a shrine to his achievement).
I myself am getting ready to spend the weekend at a yet-to be named monastery somewhere in the area (all I know is that there will be a knock on my door at 7 a.m. tomorrow morning, and will be spirited away for a designated period shortly thereafter).
Wish me luck